ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED CONSENT
ORDER TO AID PUBLIC COMMENT
The Federal Trade Commission has accepted an agreement, subject to final approval, to a
proposed consent order from J & R Research, Inc., and its principal, Gerald G.
McCarthy ("respondents"). Respondents were general partners in a distributorship
of Kaire International, Inc., a multi-level marketing company. Respondents also created
and marketed to Kaire distributors audio tapes and other promotional materials touting a
Kaire product containing pycnogenol, a substance derived from the bark of the maritime
pine tree.
The proposed consent order has been placed on the public record for sixty (60) days for
the reception of comments by interested persons. Comments received during this period will
become part of the public record. After sixty (60) days, the Commission will again review
the agreement and any comments received and will decide whether it should withdraw from
the agreement and take other appropriate action or make final the agreement's proposed
order.
Respondents' advertisements claimed that pycnogenol could mitigate or cure the effects
of numerous diseases or disorders. The proposed complaint alleges that respondents could
not substantiate claims that pycnogenol: (1) alleviates rheumatoid arthritis,
osteoarthritis and rheumatism; (2) reduces the amount of insulin needed to treat diabetes;
(3) treats and/or improves health disorders associated with diabetes, including
neuropathy, retinopathy, osteomyelitis, circulatory problems and heart problems; (4) helps
treat lupus, Parkinson's Disease, multiple sclerosis and fibromyalgia; (5) treats or
improves digestive disorders, including Crohnes Disease and irritable bowel syndrome; (6)
helps prevent strokes and the reoccurrence of strokes; (7) dramatically improve
physical disabilities caused by stroke; (8) dramatically helps prevent heart disease,
including arterial sclerosis; (9) reduces blood pressure; (10) dramatically improves and
helps prevent circulatory problems, including phlebitis, thrombophlebitis, blood clots,
and varicose veins; (11) dramatically promotes the shrinkage of tumors and helps prevent
tumor formation; (12) treats cancer and/or prolongs the life of cancer victims; (13)
reduces or eliminates inflammation of the prostate; (14) eliminates or reduces the
incidence of asthma attacks and symptoms caused by allergies; (15) improves eyesight and
treats disorders of the retina; (16) helps rebuild joints and soft tissue; (17) greatly
accelerates the healing time of injuries; (18) improves or cures skin conditions such as
psoriasis and acne; (19) treats Attention Deficit Disorder and Attention Deficit
Hyperactive Disorder; (20) reduces or eliminates the need for medication in individuals
with Attention Deficit Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder; and
(21) is twenty times more protective as an antioxidant than Vitamin C, and fifty
times more protective than Vitamin E.
The complaint further alleges that respondents falsely claimed that scientific research
demonstrates that pycnogenol products can alleviate or cure many of these diseases or
disorders. Finally, the complaint alleges that respondents could not substantiate its
claim that testimonials from consumers appearing in the advertisements for pycnogenol
products reflect the typical or ordinary experience of members of the public who use
pycnogenol products.
Part I of the proposed consent order would require respondents, when advertising
pycnogenol or any other food, drug, or dietary supplement, to possess competent and
reliable scientific evidence before making any of the claims that were alleged as
unsubstantiated in the complaint. Part II of the proposed order would require respondents
to possess competent and reliable scientific evidence before making any claim regarding
the benefits, performance, or efficacy of any food, drug, or dietary supplement. Part III
of the proposed order would prevent respondents from misrepresent the existence, contents,
validity, results, conclusions, or interpretations of any test, study, or research in an
advertisement for any product.
Part IV of the proposed order addresses claims made through endorsements or
testimonials. Under Part IV, respondents may make such representations if they possess and
rely upon competent and reliable evidence that substantiates the representations; or the
respondents must disclose either what the generally expected results would be for users of
the advertised products, or the limited applicability of the endorser's experience to what
consumers may generally expect to achieve. The proposed order's treatment of testimonial
claims is in accordance with the Commission's "Guides Concerning Use of Endorsements
and Testimonials in Advertising," 16 C.F.R. 255.2 (a).
Part V of the proposed order contains language permitting respondents to make drug
claims that have been approved by the FDA pursuant to either a new drug application or a
tentative final or final standard. Part VI states that respondents would be permitted to
make claims that the FDA has approved pursuant to the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act
of 1990.
Part VII of the proposed order requires respondents to retain, and make available to
the Commission upon request, all advertisements and promotional materials containing any
representation covered by the order, as well as any materials that it relied upon in
disseminating the representation and any materials that contradict, qualify, or call into
question the representation.
The remainder of the proposed order contains standard requirements that respondents
distribute the order to relevant personnel, that the corporate respondent notify the
Commission of any changes in corporate structure that might affect compliance with the
order; that the individual respondent notify the Commission of changes in his employments
status, and that respondents file one or more reports detailing their compliance with the
order.
The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the proposed order, and
it is not intended to constitute an official interpretation of the agreement and proposed
order, or to modify in any way their terms.
Main Page | About Grimes & Reese | Practice Areas | MLM Law Clients | MLM Articles
MLM Law Library | What Our Clients Say | What's New | Search MLM Law | Site Map